Ongoing court cases and litigation
State attorneys general play a vital role in bringing litigation that defends the rule of law, protects the rights of residents, and upholds state and federal statutes.
This page tracks ongoing lawsuits and legal actions led or joined by state AGs against the Trump administration — on topics ranging from civil rights and consumer protection to environmental justice and challenges to federal overreach. Here you’ll find case summaries, court filings, and the latest developments in high-impact litigation that reflect the evolving responsibilities of state attorneys general in today’s legal and political environment.
Click here to see a full view of the litigation led by Progressive State AGs:
All Filters
-
- Oct 2, 2026
- Environment/Climate
- Executive Power
California v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
AG coalition sues the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to block its rule weakening corporate average fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks.Read Lawsuit -
- Oct 1, 2026
- Environment/Climate
New York v. Environmental Protection Agency
AGs, the governor of Pennsylvania, and three local governments sue the Environmental Protection Agency for dismantling federal greenhouse gas pollution limits for many of the nation’s largest power plants, gutting safeguards that had required coal- and gas-fired power plants to reduce their emissions and curb the pollution fueling the climate crisis.Read Lawsuit -
- Sep 14, 2026
- Immigration
- Executive Power
New York v. Department of Homeland Security
AGs and the governor of Pennsylvania sue to halt Trump administration policy that would allow immigration officials to punish immigrants for lawful use of public benefits.Read Lawsuit -
- Sep 9, 2026
- Environment/Climate
Massachusetts v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
AG coalition sues to block two rules that weaken protections for threatened species and their critical habitats that for decades have automatically protected newly threatened species from being killed, harmed, or harassed.Read Lawsuit -
- Sep 9, 2026
- Environment/Climate
California v. Burgum
AG coalition challenges rules declaring that harming a protected area is only illegal if it is a direct, intentional act against an individual animal, leaving habitat destruction completely unregulated even when it kills or injures a species.Read Lawsuit -
- Sep 2, 2026
- LGBTQ Rights
- Healthcare
- Funding Freeze
Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
AG coalition and the governor of Pennsylvania sue the Trump administration to stop a rule that would ban federal reimbursement for medically necessary care for transgender young people enrolled in Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.Read Lawsuit -
- Aug 27, 2026
- Reproductive Rights
- Funding Freeze
New York v. Department of Health and Human Services
AGs sue to block new conditions on Title X family planning funds which penalize states and providers that refuse to abandon nondiscrimination protections or conform public family planning programs to the administration's narrow ideological agenda.Read Lawsuit -
- Aug 26, 2026
- Democracy Protection/Voting Rights
California v. United States Postal Service
AG coalition and the governor of Pennsylvania sue the United States Postal Service to block a new rule that seeks to usurp states’ control of mail voting in elections by establishing a national voter list and directing the U.S. Postal Service to transmit mail ballots only to voters on the list.Read Lawsuit -
- Aug 11, 2026
- Executive Power
Oregon v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
AG coalition sues the administration over its attempt to override state laws requiring mortgage lenders to pay homeowners interest on homeowners’ money that lenders hold in escrow for taxes and insurance.Read Lawsuit -
- Aug 3, 2026
- Executive Power
- Consumer Protection
Oregon v. Trump
AG coalition and the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania sue the Trump administration for instituting another round of unlawful and arbitrary tariffs, these justified by an alleged desire to reduce forced labor as a pretext for this new illegal tariff scheme.Read Lawsuit