Ongoing court cases and litigation

State attorneys general play a vital role in bringing litigation that defends the rule of law, protects the rights of residents, and upholds state and federal statutes.  

This page tracks ongoing lawsuits and legal actions led or joined by state AGs against the Trump administration — on topics ranging from civil rights and consumer protection to environmental justice and challenges to federal overreach. Here you’ll find case summaries, court filings, and the latest developments in high-impact litigation that reflect the evolving responsibilities of state attorneys general in today’s legal and political environment. 

Click here to see a full view of the litigation led by Progressive State AGs:

State Attorney General Federal Litigation Tracker

Selected Filters:

    • Aug 6, 2025
    • Environment/Climate

    Resource Adequacy Report: Evaluating the Reliability and Security of the United States Electric Grid

    The Attorneys General of Maryland, Washington, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, and New York move to intervene in this proceeding pursuant to Section 313l of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 825l, and request that the Department of Energy grant rehearing of its July 7, 2025 report titled "Resource Adequacy Report: Evaluating the Reliability and Security of the United States Electric Grid." The report claims the U.S. will face a significantly increased risk of power outages by 2030 if scheduled coal and natural gas plant retirements are allowed to proceed. It recommends keeping these plants running to maintain grid reliability. The coalition warns that the DOE report could be used as the basis to renew emergency orders under the Federal Power Act that force the continued operation of aging coal-powered plants. The report may also serve as justification for future orders affecting coal plants in the state and across the country.
    Read Lawsuit
    • Aug 8, 2024
    • Immigration
    • Healthcare

    Kansas v. United States

    AGs move to intervene in case that began when Kansas sued the Biden administration for allowing DACA recipients to buy insurance on the ACA exchange. With the change in administration, AGs seek to intervene to defend the rule.
    Read Lawsuit